816-741-7882
Professional services with a personal touch.

Accounting

11/16/2017

McRuer CPAs 2017 Year-End Tax Guide

The 2017 calendar year is wrapping up quickly. While many of us have our eyes on the holiday season, this is the time to review your personal and business financial goals. Think of it as a  “checkup” to make certain you make the most effective, tax-savvy financial moves to end this year fiscally healthy.

"Timely financial planning is one of the best gifts you can give yourself as it will affect you and/or your business for years to come."

Even with significant tax reform expected for the 2018 tax season, we are still working under the federal and state tax laws that are on the books for 2017 taxes. We have compiled a quick tax tip guide to review some of the financial topics that we have determined to be the most important and relevant tax issues for most taxpayers for year-end review.

Click now to download the 2017 McRuer CPAs Year-End Tax Tips Guide.

Each individual and business is unique, so consider discussing your options with a professional in time to make any tax-saving moves that may help your particular needs. Please contact us if you have any questions or would like to schedule a year-end tax planning session with a McRuer CPAs Tax Planning Team Member.  If you are already a McRuer CPAs client, the year-end planning session is free.  Call us at: 816.741.7882.

11/03/2017

Details of House Tax Reform Bill

As you may know the House Ways and Means Committee has released the Tax Cut and Jobs Act (H.R. 1) providing some new tax reform provisions while incorporating many of the details included in the Republican-backed tax reform package submitted in September. There are a number of tax issues that may affect you, should they be approved following the budget debate process in Washington. Those details include changes, updates and protections for various business and individual tax rates, deductions and retirement plan contributions.

Tax-Reform with flagThe Journal of Accountancy has published an article with a review of the provisions of the new tax proposal draft (as submitted before debate and possible amendments) that offers a review of many of the details that we hope will be informative and helpful to you as you begin thinking of year-end tax planning.

 Note: his article has been published by the Journal of Accountancy, a professional’s resource for information regarding accounting and taxation issues.  It is the primary publication, as edited and released by the Association of International Certified Professional Accountants. It is one of many resources we use at McRuer CPAs to keep us informed about issues that affect the businesses and individuals we serve.  This particular news information article regards the consideration of a legislative proposal. Such initial legislation is subjected to debate and amendments. Therefore, this first review of the tax reform legislation draft is to be considered as a preliminary summary and first look at the new tax reform proposal and may not be the actual legislation approved by lawmakers over time.

For a look at the actual bill itself, noting that the language will likely be edited in several ways before passing, click here.

Details of Tax Reform Legislation Revealed

By Sally Schreiber, J.D.; Paul Bonner; and Alistair Nevius, J.D.

The House Ways and Means Committee released draft tax reform legislation on Thursday. The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, H.R. 1, incorporates many of the provisions listed in the Republicans’ September tax reform framework while providing new details. Budget legislation passed in October would allow for the tax reform bill to cut federal government revenue by up to $1.5 trillion over the next 10 years and still be enacted under the Senate’s budget reconciliation rules, which would require only 51 votes in the Senate for passage. The Joint Committee on Taxation issued an estimate of the revenue effects of the bill on Thursday showing a net total revenue loss of $1.487 trillion over 10 years.

The bill features new tax rates, a lower limit on the deductibility of home mortgage interest, the repeal of most deductions for individuals, and full expensing of depreciable assets by businesses, among its many provisions.

Lawmakers had reportedly been discussing lowering the contribution limits for Sec. 401(k) plans, but the bill does not include any changes to those limits.

The Senate Finance Committee is reportedly working on its own version of tax reform legislation, which is expected to be unveiled next week. It is unclear how much that bill will differ from the House bill released on Thursday.

Individuals

Tax rates: The bill would impose four tax rates on individuals: 12%, 25%, 35%, and 39.6%, effective for tax years after 2017. The current rates are 10%, 15%, 25%, 28%, 33%, 35%, and 39.6%. The 25% bracket would start at $45,000 of taxable income for single taxpayers and at $90,000 for married taxpayers filing jointly.

The 35% bracket would start at $200,000 of taxable income for single taxpayers and at $260,000 for married taxpayers filing jointly. And the 39.6% bracket would apply to taxable income over $500,000 for single taxpayers and $1 million for joint filers.

Standard deduction and personal exemption: The standard deduction would increase from $6,350 to $12,200 for single taxpayers and from $12,700 to $24,400 for married couples filing jointly, effective for tax years after 2017. Single filers with at least one qualifying child would get an $18,300 standard deduction. These amounts will be adjusted for inflation after 2019. However, the personal exemption would be eliminated.

Deductions: Most deductions would be repealed, including the medical expense deduction, the alimony deduction, and the casualty loss deduction (except for personal casualty losses associated with special disaster relief legislation). The deduction for tax preparation fees would also be eliminated.

However, the deductions for charitable contributions and for mortgage interest would be retained. The mortgage interest deduction on existing mortgages would remain the same; for newly purchased residences (that is, for debt incurred after Nov. 2, 2017), the limit on deductibility would be reduced to $500,000 of acquisition indebtedness from the current $1.1 million. The overall limitation of itemized deductions would also be repealed.

Some rules for charitable contributions would change for tax years beginning after 2017. Among those changes, the current 50% limitation would be increased to 60%.

The deduction for state and local income or sales taxes would be eliminated, except that income or sales taxes paid in carrying out a trade or business or producing income would still be deductible. State and local real property taxes would continue to be deductible, but only up to $10,000. These provisions would be effective for tax years beginning after Dec. 31, 2017.

Credits: Various credits would also be repealed by the bill, including the adoption tax credit, the credit for the elderly and the totally and permanently disabled, the credit associated with mortgage credit certificates, and the credit for plug-in electric vehicles.

The child tax credit would be increased from $1,000 to $1,600, and a $300 credit would be allowed for nonchild dependents. A new “family flexibility” credit of $300 would be allowed for other dependents. The $300 credit for nonchild dependents and the family flexibility credit would expire after 2022.

The American opportunity tax credit, the Hope scholarship credit, and the lifetime learning credit would be combined into one credit, providing a 100% tax credit on the first $2,000 of eligible higher education expenses and a 25% credit on the next $2,000, effective for tax years after 2017. Contributions to Coverdell education savings accounts (except rollover contributions) would be prohibited after 2017, but taxpayers would be allowed to roll over money in their Coverdell ESAs into a Sec. 529 plan.

The bill would also repeal the deduction for interest on education loans and the deduction for qualified tuition and related expenses, as well as the exclusion for interest on U.S. savings bonds used to pay qualified higher education expenses, the exclusion for qualified tuition reduction programs, and the exclusion for employer-provided education assistance programs.

Other taxes: The bill would repeal the alternative minimum tax (AMT).

The estate tax would be repealed after 2023 (with the step-up in basis for inherited property retained). In the meantime, the estate tax exclusion amount would double (currently it is $5,490,000, indexed for inflation). The top gift tax rate would be lowered to 35%.

Passthrough income: A portion of net income distributions from passthrough entities would be taxed at a maximum rate of 25%, instead of at ordinary individual income tax rates, effective for tax years after 2017. The bill includes provisions to prevent individuals from converting wage income into passthrough distributions. Passive activity income would always be eligible for the 25% rate.

For income from nonpassive business activities (including wages), owners and shareholders generally could elect to treat 30% of the income as eligible for the 25% rate; the other 70% would be taxed at ordinary income rates. Alternatively, owners and shareholders could apply a facts-and-circumstances formula.

However, for specified service activities, the applicable percentage that would be eligible for the 25% rate would be zero. These activities are those defined in Sec. 1202(e)(3)(A) (any trade or business involving the performance of services in the fields of health, law, engineering, architecture, accounting, actuarial science, performing arts, consulting, athletics, financial services, brokerage services, or any trade or business where the principal asset of such trade or business is the reputation or skill of one or more of its employees), including investing, trading, or dealing in securities, partnership interests, or commodities.

Business provisions

A flat corporate rate: The bill would replace the current four-tier schedule of corporate rates (15%, 25%, 34%, and 35%, with a $75,001 threshold for the 34% rate) with a flat 20% rate (25% for personal services corporations). The corporate AMT is repealed along with the individual AMT.

Higher expensing levels: The bill would provide 100% expensing of qualified property acquired and placed in service after Sept. 27, 2017, and before Jan. 1, 2023 (with an additional year for longer-production-period property). It would also increase tenfold the Sec. 179 expensing limitation ceiling and phaseout threshold to $5 million and $20 million, respectively, both indexed for inflation.

Cash accounting method more widely available: The bill would increase to $25 million the current $5 million average gross receipts ceiling for corporations generally permitted to use the cash method of accounting and extend it to businesses with inventories. Such businesses also would be exempted from the uniform capitalization (UNICAP) rules. The exemption from the percentage-of-completion method for long-term contracts of $10 million in average gross receipts would also be increased to $25 million.

NOLs, other deductions eliminated or limited: Deductions of net operating losses (NOLs) would be limited to 90% of taxable income. NOLs would have an indefinite carryforward period, but carrybacks would no longer be available for most businesses. Carryforwards for losses arising after 2017 would be increased by an interest factor. Other deductions also would be curtailed or eliminated:

  • Instead of the current provisions under Sec. 163(j) limiting a deduction for business interest paid to a related party or basing a limitation on the taxpayer’s debt-equity ratio or a percentage of adjusted taxable income, the bill would impose a limit of 30% of adjusted taxable income for all businesses with more than $25 million in average gross receipts.
  • The Sec. 199 domestic production activities deduction would be repealed.
  • Deductions for entertainment, amusement, or recreation activities as a business expense would be generally eliminated, as would employee fringe benefits for transportation and certain other perks deemed personal in nature rather than directly related to a trade or business, except to the extent that such benefits are treated as taxable compensation to an employee (or includible in gross income of a recipient who is not an employee).

Like-kind exchanges limited to real estate: The bill would limit like-kind exchange treatment to real estate, but a transition rule would allow completion of currently pending Sec. 1031 exchanges of personal property.

Business and energy credits curtailed: Offsetting some of the revenue loss resulting from the lower top corporate tax rate, the bill would repeal a number of business credits, including:

  • The work opportunity tax credit (Sec. 51).
  • The credit for employer-provided child care (Sec. 45F).
  • The credit for rehabilitation of qualified buildings or certified historic structures (Sec. 47).
  • The Sec. 45D new markets tax credit. Credits allocated before 2018 could still be used in up to seven subsequent years.
  • The credit for providing access to disabled individuals (Sec. 44).
  • The credit for enhanced oil recovery (Sec. 43).
  • The credit for producing oil and gas from marginal wells (Sec. 45I)

Other credits would be modified, including those for a portion of employer Social Security taxes paid with respect to employee tips (Sec. 45B), for electricity produced from certain renewable resources (Sec. 45), for production from advanced nuclear power facilities (Sec. 45J), and the investment tax credit (Sec. 46) for eligible energy property. The Sec. 25D residential energy-efficient property credit, which expired for property placed in service after 2016, would be extended retroactively through 2022 but reduced beginning in 2020.

Bond provisions: Several types of tax-exempt bonds would become taxable:

  • Private activity bonds would no longer be tax-exempt. The bill would include in taxpayer income interest on such bonds issued after 2017.
  • Interest on bonds issued to finance construction of, or capital expenditures for, a professional sports stadium would be taxable.
  • Interest on advance refunding bonds would be taxable.
  • Current provisions relating to tax credit bonds would generally be repealed. Holders and issuers would continue receiving tax credits and payments for tax credit bonds already issued, but no new bonds could be issued.

Insurance provisions: The bill would introduce several revenue-raising provisions modifying special rules applicable to the insurance industry. These include bringing life insurers’ NOL carryover rules into conformity with those of other businesses.

Compensation provisions: The bill would impose new limits on the deductibility of certain highly paid employees’ pay, including, for the first time, those of tax-exempt organizations.

  • Nonqualified deferred compensation would be subject to tax in the tax year in which it is no longer subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture. Current law would apply to existing nonqualified deferred compensation arrangements until the last tax year beginning before 2026.
  • The exceptions for commissions and performance-based compensation from the Sec. 162(m) $1 million limitation on deductibility of compensation of certain top employees of publicly traded corporations would be repealed. The bill would also include more employees in the definition of “covered employee” subject to the limit.
  • The bill would impose similar rules on executives of organizations exempt from tax under Sec. 501(a), with a 20% excise tax on compensation exceeding $1 million paid to any of a tax-exempt organization’s five highest-paid employees, including “excess parachute payments.”

Foreign income and persons

Deduction for foreign-source dividends received by 10% U.S. corporate owners: The bill would add a new section to the Code, Sec. 245A, which replaces the foreign tax credit for dividends received by a U.S. corporation with a dividend-exemption system. This provision would be effective for distributions made after 2017. This provision is designed to eliminate the “lock-out” effect that encourages U.S. companies not to bring earnings back to the United States.

The bill would also repeal Sec. 902, the indirect foreign tax credit provision, and amend Sec. 960 to coordinate with the bill’s dividends-received provision. Thus, no foreign tax credit or deduction would be allowed for any taxes (including withholding taxes) paid or accrued with respect to any dividend to which the dividend exemption of the bill would apply.

Elimination of U.S. tax on reinvestments in U.S. property: Under current law, a foreign subsidiary’s undistributed earnings that are reinvested in U.S. property are subject to current U.S. tax. The bill would amend Sec. 956(a) to eliminate this tax on reinvestments in the United States for tax years of foreign corporations beginning after Dec. 31, 2017. This provision would remove the disincentive from reinvesting foreign earnings in the United States.

Limitation on loss deductions for 10%-owned foreign corporations: In a companion provision to the deduction for foreign-source dividends, the bill would amend Sec. 961 and add new Sec. 91 to require a U.S. parent to reduce the basis of its stock in a foreign subsidiary by the amount of any exempt dividends received by the U.S. parent from its foreign subsidiary, but only for determining loss, not gain. The provision also requires a U.S. corporation that transfers substantially all of the assets of a foreign branch to a foreign subsidiary to include in the U.S. corporation’s income the amount of any post-2017 losses that were incurred by the branch. The provisions would be effective for distributions or transfers made after 2017.

Repatriation provision: The bill would amend Sec. 956 to provide that U.S. shareholders owning at least 10% of a foreign subsidiary will include in income for the subsidiary’s last tax year beginning before 2018 the shareholder’s pro rata share of the net post-1986 historical earnings and profits (E&P) of the foreign subsidiary to the extent that E&P have not been previously subject to U.S. tax, determined as of Nov. 2, 2017, or Dec. 31, 2017 (whichever is higher). The portion of E&P attributable to cash or cash equivalents would be taxed at a 12% rate; the remainder would be taxed at a 5% rate. U.S. shareholders can elect to pay the tax liability over eight years in equal annual installments of 12.5% of the total tax due.

Income from production activities sourced: The bill would amend Sec. 863(b) to provide that income from the sale of inventory property produced within and sold outside the United States (or vice versa) is allocated solely on the basis of the production activities for the inventory.

Changes to Subpart F rules: The bill would repeal the foreign shipping income and foreign base company oil-related income rules. It would also add an inflation adjustment to the de minimis exception to the foreign base company income rules and make permanent the lookthrough rule, under which passive income one foreign subsidiary receives from a related foreign subsidiary generally is not includible in the taxable income of the U.S. parent, provided that income was not subject to current U.S. tax or effectively connected with a U.S. trade or business.

Under the bill, a U.S. corporation would be treated as constructively owning stock held by its foreign shareholder for purposes of determining CFC status. The bill would also eliminate the requirements that a U.S. parent corporation must control a foreign subsidiary for 30 days before Subpart F inclusions apply.

Base erosion provisions: Under the bill, a U.S. parent of one or more foreign subsidiaries would be subject to current U.S. tax on 50% of the U.S. parent’s foreign high returns—the excess of the U.S. parent’s foreign subsidiaries’ aggregate net income over a routine return (7% plus the federal short-term rate) on the foreign subsidiaries’ aggregate adjusted bases in depreciable tangible property, adjusted downward for interest expense.

The deductible net interest expense of a U.S. corporation that is a member of an international financial reporting group would be limited to the extent the U.S. corporation’s share of the group’s global net interest expense exceeds 110% of the U.S. corporation’s share of the group’s global earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA).

Payments (other than interest) made by a U.S. corporation to a related foreign corporation that are deductible, includible in costs of goods sold, or includible in the basis of a depreciable or amortizable asset would be subject to a 20% excise tax, unless the related foreign corporation elected to treat the payments as income effectively connected with the conduct of a U.S. trade or business. Consequently, the foreign corporation’s net profits (or gross receipts if no election is made) with respect to those payments would be subject to full U.S. tax, eliminating the potential U.S. tax benefit otherwise achieved.

Exempt organizations

Clarification that state and local entities are subject to unrelated business income tax (UBIT): The bill would amend Sec. 511 to clarify that all state and local entities including pension plans are subject to the Sec. 511 tax on unrelated business income (UBI).

Exclusion from UBIT for research income: The act would amend the Code to provide that income from research is exempt from UBI only if the results are freely made available to the public.

Reduction in excise tax paid by private foundations: The bill would repeal the current rules that apply either a 1% or 2% tax on private foundations’ net investment income with a 1.4% rate for tax years beginning after 2017.

Modification of the Johnson Amendment: Effective on the date of enactment, the bill would amend Sec. 501 to permit statements about political campaigns to be made by religious organizations.

Sally P. Schreiber (Sally.Schreiber@aicpa-cima.com) and Paul Bonner (Paul.Bonner@aicpa-cima.com) are JofA senior editors, and Alistair M. Nevius (Alistair.Nevius@aicpa-cima.com) is the JofA’s editor-in-chief, tax.

03/09/2016

State-Managed Retirement Savings Accounts Now in 27 States

Retirement jar 1Several states are working on plans to help workers save for retirement. The Bureau of Labor Statistics shows that only about half of full-time workers employed by small businesses or organizations have access to an employer-based retirement plan. By comparison, the numbers show 85 percent of Americans who work for employers with 100 or more employees do have access to an employer-provided retirement plan or benefits program.

To help close the gap, some states are providing access for eligible workers to state-managed individual retirement accounts funded by automatic deductions from the worker’s paychecks.  For example, in 2017 Illinois will launch the Secure Choice Retirement Savings Program, which gives workers a retirement plan option. Full-time employees working for qualified businesses (who do not already provide retirement benefits) will be automatically enrolled into a direct deduction retirement savings plan with a minimum three percent deduction each paycheck.  The employee can choose to have more withheld or to opt out of the program entirely. The money is deposited into a Roth IRA.

The Pension Rights Center in Washington, DC has been monitoring the development of state-administered retirement plans for private-sector workers. It shows that currently 27 states have already approved or are debating proposals to launch state-based retirement plans including: Arizona, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Nebraska, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oregon, Rhode Island, Utah, Vermont, Virginia, Washington, West Virginia and Wisconsin.

Last September, the Government Accountability Office (GAO) published a report detailing how “half of private sector workers, especially those who are low-income or employed by small firms, lack coverage from a workplace retirement savings program primarily because they do not have access.” The GAO is recommending ways that the federal government can make it easier for states to manage such plans, while not placing a financial or administrative burden on small business.

01/25/2016

Tips to Keep Tax Records Safe

Imagine a burglar breaks into your home while you’re at work. The thief doesn’t steal jewelry, your TV or your favorite collectible. Instead, the thief heads directly to the home office files and steals your tax documents and bills where you’ve organized your records alphabetically to make them easier to find. The thief checks out your basement, closet and upstairs attic for boxes that look like they contain financial records. The thief walks out with paper. Tax_related_identity_theft

All in all, the paper value of the loss is negligible, but the thief has stolen all of your and your family members’ personal information and private financial data. The end result is that you and your loved ones could suffer hundreds of thousands of dollars or more in identity-theft related damages that may follow you the rest of your lives. It could also affect your taxes.

Tax documents in particular contain your and your dependent’s tax and personal information including receipts, old W-2 forms and bank account information. Experts point out that all documents containing your financial, health and tax information, especially records with your Social Security number on them, should be kept securely.

Most of us are being more diligent about using passwords and keeping digital connections and information about our personal data secure online. However, many taxpayers may have forgotten about the old paper copies that remain unprotected and vulnerable. Almost daily the IRS uncovers new scams using stolen identities. These scammers file fake tax returns under legitimate taxpayer Social Security numbers seeking refunds. The stolen IDs come from online and paper copy sources.

The issue is that taxpayers are supposed to keep records but doing so may provide an opportunity for someone else to take advantage. Regulations mandate that we keep a record of our tax returns and their supporting documents (receipts, statements, etc.) for a minimum of three years to a maximum of seven years. Additionally, we are to keep records related to a property we own for three to seven years after disposing of it.

To keep things safe, if you keep paper tax records, make certain they are stored in a locked and secure area such as a locked desk drawer, locked file or safe. Consider scanning your records instead and saving them electronically in encrypted files, both on your computer and your hard drive back-up. This also applies to all financial and health records that contain your personal and account information.

Converting paper files to digital files takes time and may require a scanner and a small investment in software to accept scanned documents (though many printers today serve that function). Remember that you’ll need encryption software. Make certain you keep your passwords in a secure place as well. You may also request electronic versions of your tax documents from your tax preparer, who should already be submitting your records in an electronic version to the IRS.

Dispose of paper tax records by shredding them first. If you are disposing of an old computer or any other product with a hard drive, remember that just “deleting” a file does not erase it completely from the computer. Electronic products that can hold data should be “wiped” to ensure all data is wiped out. This will require specialized disk utility software. Your computer, your mobile phones and tablets, most printers, copiers and all other electronic devices that can save files should be wiped before disposal.

To keep your computer files secure from an online thief, experts recommend you use reputable security software that updates automatically with essential tools including a firewall, virus and malware protection and file encryption options for sensitive data. Use strong passwords, protect them and back up your files regularly.

An IRS publication sums it up this way, “Treat your personal information like cash, don’t leave it lying around.”

01/15/2016

Tax Extenders & The Deficit Dilemma

Though Congress has received some applause for reviving a set of more than 50 tax breaks, called “tax extenders,” there is as much dismay-driven head shaking over the fact that the bipartisan agreement and the now signed budget bill dig the federal deficit hole even deeper.

The new tax law, entitled the Protecting Americans from Tax Hikes (PATH) Act of 2015, and the newly signed funding bill provide $1.1 trillion to cover spending for most government agencies to the end of fiscal year 2016, perhaps coincidentally past the upcoming presidential election. The defense sector, NASA, the Food and Drug Administration and the National Institutes of Health received a bit of a boost with most other agency funding remaining flat. ENews 2016 pic tax-credit3

IRS funding restrictions remain, so it’s expected that taxpayers will continue experiencing communication and customer service problems and an increase in computer-generated correspondence audits throughout 2016 and 2017. The new National Taxpayer Advocate Annual Report to Congress blasts the IRS for planning to “substantially reduce telephone and face-to-face interaction with taxpayers,” turning that job over to tax return preparers and tax software companies.

Meanwhile, the good news for taxpayers is that the PATH Act makes permanent several charitable tax provisions, indicating that lawmakers support using tax incentives to encourage charitable giving. For example, those 70 ½ or older may contribute up to $100,000 from an IRA directly to a charity with the contribution qualifying for their required minimum distribution (also known as Qualified Charitable Distribution (QCD) rules).

Other permanently renewed tax provisions include the American Opportunity Tax Credit for college expenses and the deduction for state and local sales taxes. The schoolteacher expense deduction has been enhanced and made permanent, as has the child tax credit.

The mortgage insurance premiums and qualified residence interest deductions have been extended for another year. Taxpayers who suffered losses from selling their home for less than the outstanding mortgage will also be able to avoid the tax consequences from debt cancellation under the Mortgage Debt Relief Act for another year.

Companies that utilize bonus depreciation like those involved in the telecommunications industry or who invest in capital-intensive projects will continue enjoying this helpful tax provision for a few more years. The tax law also makes permanent the research and development tax credit, which encourages important business R&D like that in the pharmaceutical and defense sectors.

The solar investment tax credit (ITC) and the wind production tax credit (PTC) are being phased out but will remain active through 2019 and 2021 respectively. The energy industry overall has received both tax incentives and funding resources, adding a boost of confidence to alternative energy producers.

Tax increases levied on individuals and businesses to pay for the Affordable Care Act (Obamacare) continue to be unpopular, and some were not enacted. Now it’s possible the two most controversial taxes may be repealed. These are the proposed tax on medical devices and the 40% excise “Cadillac” taxes on higher-priced employer-sponsored health plans that compete with government-sponsored plans.

The 2015 year-end budget battle, which starts our new tax year without delays, was a fistfight compared to the combative, destructive delay-causing 2014 debate. Yet, even as lawmakers are cooling to budget debates, the looming budget deficit has not disappeared and continues to grow. Our 2016 budget will add to the deficit, rather than reduce it. The Congressional Budget Office reports that overall US Treasury debt has grown to 74% of GDP that “could have serious negative consequences for the nation, including restraining economic growth in the long term ... and eventually increasing the risk of financial crisis.”

Overall, the bipartisan tax bill was passed with the understanding that Congress is committed to comprehensive tax reform that will simplify the tax code, eliminate temporary provisions and lower tax rates by broadening the tax base. Lawmakers who supported the PATH Act stated in a news release, “Americans deserve a simpler, fairer and flatter tax code that’s built for growth, and this bill will help make that possible.” The 2016 election year will likely determine how far that ship will sail.

If you have any questions about how the current tax law affects your individual and/or business tax obligation, please contact us now at McRuer CPAs for a tax planning session.

01/14/2016

IRS Mistake On New PIN Letters About Identity Theft

Pic identity-theft11_11576849The IRS has issued a statement admitting it made a mistake regarding a recent letter mailed to millions of taxpayers.  The letter has to do with requesting taxpayers who participate in the IRS' income tax electronic filing and information exchange system online.  The letters are notifying taxpayers that they have been assigned a new PIN number as part of the implementation of the new 2016 IRS identity theft prevention program.  The problem is the letter states the PIN applies to the tax year 2014 when it should have said the PIN applies to the 2015 tax year.  

Here is part of the admission of error from the IRS:

"The IRS IP PIN is a 6-digit number assigned to eligible taxpayers to help prevent the misuse of their Social Security number on fraudulent federal income tax returns. The IP PIN helps us verify a taxpayer’s identity and accept their electronic or paper tax return.

Due to an error, taxpayers are receiving Identity Protection PIN letters with an incorrect year listed. Taxpayers and tax professionals should be advised the IP PIN listed on the CP01A Notice dated January 4, 2016 is valid for use on all individual tax returns filed in 2016.

The notice incorrectly indicates the IP PIN issued is to be used for filing the 2014 tax return when the number is actually to be used for the 2015 tax return.  The IRS emphasizes the IP PIN listed on the CP 01A notice is valid for the 2015 returns. Taxpayers and their tax professionals should use this PIN number for 2015 tax returns, which the IRS will begin accepting from taxpayers starting Jan. 19, 2016.

The IRS apologizes for the confusion and any inconvenience."

For more information, click here for a link to the entire news release.

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact one of our tax experts at McRuer CPAs.

12/18/2015

2015 Tax Extenders Summary

After months of uncertainty and speculation, it appears Congress has finally sufficiently collaborated to propose the “Tax Extenders” legislation in which a large number of expired tax provisions will be extended, some permanently.  Some tax credits that would be made permanent include the Child Tax Credit, the American Opportunity Tax Credit and the Earned Income Tax Credit

Of particular interest, it appears Section 179 will be permanently fixed at $500,000 of qualified assets for years in which taxpayers place in service up to $2,000,000 of assets.  For amounts above $2,000,000, the Section 179 deduction is reduced dollar for dollar until $2,500,000, at which time no asset additions are eligible.  Bonus depreciation is temporarily extended at 50% for 2015, 2016 and 2017, then stepped down to 40% in 2018 and 30% in 2019, after which time it is scheduled to be completely phased out.

To find out more information about the specifics of the legislation, here are some online resources:

If you have any questions about how these tax extenders may affect you or your business bottom line, please contact us at McRuer CPAs by calling 816.741.7882 or click here to connect with us online.

12/15/2015

Standard Mileage Rates Go Down in 2016

Standard mileage rateThe IRS has released the standard mileage rate allowances for the 2016 tax year. The deductible amounts will be less per mile than in 2015. 

The business mileage rate decreased 3.5 cents per mile and the medical, and moving expense rates decrease 4 cents per mile from the 2015 rates.

Click here to read the complete IRS release on the 2016 rates.

If you need more information or have a question, contact us at McRuer CPAs.

03/02/2015

Defining Taxable Income in Today’s Marketplace

It’s no secret that most income is taxable and must be reported on your federal income tax return.  However, did you know that even your state income tax refund may be taxable as income?  At the peak of individual income tax preparation season, let’s review what income is taxable and what is not to help you file an accurate tax return.

Accountant1Most taxpayers realize taxable income includes money they earn, like wages, tips, business income, interest and dividends.  But taxes may also be due on various other payments taxpayers receive.  Among the most commonly overlooked sources of taxable income include bartering, tax refunds and scholarships.

Bartering income: In today’s online marketplace the popularity of bartering is booming. Bartering is an exchange of property and services.  In fact, it's so popular that the primary business of some businesses is facilitating and documenting bartering between businessess.  As far as income tax is concerned, the fair market value of property or services made through bartering is taxable as income whether or not that bartering occurred online.

State income tax refund: Many taxpayers don’t realize that even a state or local income tax refund may be taxable depending upon whether you itemized your deductions.  If you did not itemize your deductions on your federal tax return for the same year to which your state or local tax refund applies, you do not have to report the refund as income.  But, if you received a state or local income tax refund this year relating to an itemized deduction you filed in an earlier year, you may have to include all or part of the refund as income on your tax return.  You may have received a Form 1099-G detailing this income.  Whether or not you owe taxes on it, you must report the refund on your federal tax return.

Scholarships:  Many taxpayers who receive scholarships helping them pay their education costs don’t realize that the scholarship payment is tax free only if it is used to pay for certain costs, like tuition and required books.  But, the portion of the scholarship money that is used for room and board is taxable income.

Other income may or may not be taxable depending upon a variety of circumstances.  Here is a review of some other common income sources that raise the most questions.

Life and Disability Insurance: Life insurance proceeds received upon the insured person’s death are usually not taxable.  However, if you redeem your own life insurance policy for its cash value, the amount you receive exceeding what you paid for the policy is taxable.  Disability Insurance payments may also be taxable in many instances.  Businesses often overlook that they must also report this income paid to employees.

Court awards: Court awards or settlements for personal injury or sickness are usually tax free, but punitive damages or compensation for lost wages are usually taxable.

IRAs: Money you take out of an IRA may or may not be taxable depending upon the kind of IRA.  Money taken out of a traditional IRA is generally taxable, but money withdrawn from a Roth IRA is usually tax-free.

Some income is only partially taxable or is not subject to any income tax.  For example, child support payments, gifts, inheritances, and welfare benefits are usually tax-free.  Unemployment benefits are taxable income.  Social security benefits below certain income levels are usually tax-free.  However, once the taxpayer’s income exceeds a certain level, taxes are due on the benefit exceeding the income limits.

Today, the tendrils of taxation twist through and attach to a wide range of income sources.  If you need more information about how taxes may affect income you have received, please contact McRuer CPAs for more information.

02/27/2015

Have a Complicated Tax Return? Here's What to Do

Is preparing your own income tax return becoming more complicated every year? How do you know when it's time to hire a professional?

Taxpayer with stack of papersConsider these questions as you determine whether you should turn to an accountant to help you file your tax return:  

Are you confident you know enough about new laws that apply to your income tax filing?  

Have you had a major life event that will affect how you file your return such as; the change or loss of a job, buying or selling a home, addition or loss of a dependent, education expenses, borrowing money from an IRA, buying or selling a business, experiencing a major illness, or going through a divorce?

Are you certain you know what forms to use? Are you confident you are calculating deductions and credits properly?  Are you stressing out over what you're finding out about your income and what you don't know about your income taxes?  Have you received a letter from the IRS about an income tax issue?

If any of the above questions apply to you, it's time to talk to an accountant who is experienced and qualified to handle even the most complicated tax return.

What to Do About Complicated Income Taxes

When you realize that you can no longer prepare your income taxes on your own, don't panic. Instead, do your best to get organized to present your income tax "story" to a professional.  This means get your documents in order.  Collect any documents that report income you have earned in the past year as well as any proof of any federal, state and local taxes you may have already paid.

Gather up receipts and statements that will document your expenses that may qualify as tax deductions or result in a tax credit.  Categorize the documents by subject and date to help the tax professional you select better understand your financial picture and how it applies to your tax obligation.

Find copies of your tax returns from the past two years to show your chosen tax professional so that a thorough review of your tax filing history can be made.  There may be something that was missed that could save you tax dollars or cost you in the long-run.  The sooner the issues are identifed, the better.

Note: Complicated tax issues and questions do not go away if you simply ignore them.  Bring any tax-related question or issue you have with you to your appointment with a tax preparation expert. They will help you understand the significance and meaning of IRS letters or other documents. Sometimes taxpayers ignore important notices because they are hard to understand or feel that the information is wrong or doesn't apply to them, but that can be a costly mistake. 

Graphic with ad infoWith tax laws and regulations changing on a regular basis, it is essential that you use a tax professional who fully understands these changes and how to apply them to your unique situation.

Without expert tax preparation assistance, many taxpayers who fill out their own returns make unnecessary errors either through miscalculation of numbers or through not knowing the proper forms to file.  All of this can cost plenty in fees, penalties and interest payments.  So, the cost of making mistakes and omissions should be carefully considered against the cost of bringing a professional on board to help you with tax preparation.

When you decide that it's time you find a tax expert, we hope you'll choose McRuer CPAs.  No matter the tax problem, we can help you make the best choices efficiently and effectively while helping you put together a long-term plan to make certain you pay no more than the taxes you owe. That will give you peace of mind.

Contact us online by clicking here or all us at 816.741.7882.

RSS Feed

Welcome from Scott McRuer
& the McRuer CPAs Team

Scott McRuer
Learn more about Scott

Follow Scott and his team on your favorite social media

Facebook LinkedIn YouTube